What we know about the symptoms — and the severity — of the omicron variant

This article was originally published on January 6, 2022, at https://www.npr.org. Written by Michaeleen Doucleff and Will Stone.


 
 

The variant looked wildly different from earlier versions of the coronavirus — and it quickly became clear that these mutations gave omicron an uncanny ability to sidestep our vaccines and spread very rapidly.

But it has taken longer to untangle what, if anything, sets an omicron illness apart from that of its predecessors. And most of all, does this variant cause less severe disease than the variants that have come before it?

With infections at all-time highs in the U.S., the clinical picture is now coming together and starting to confirm what other countries have found — a typical case of omicron not only presents slightly differently but also likely carries a lower chance of getting seriously ill.


 

COMIC: If history is a guide, schools will start requiring COVID vaccines

This article was originally published at https://www.npr.org on November 5, 2021. Written by Anya Kamenetz & LA Johnson.


 
 

For the past four decades, all 50 U.S. states have required that parents, if they want to enroll their children in any school, public or private, must vaccinate them against contagious diseases like polio and measles. The reason is simple: High rates of vaccination dramatically cut deaths and have all but eliminated some diseases.

But as long as there have been vaccines, there have been people who oppose them, formerly known as "anti-vaccinationists."

 

I Got A 'Mild' Breakthrough Case. Here's What I Wish I'd Known

This article was originally published at https://www.npr.org/ on September 12, 2021. Written by Will Stone.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

"There was so much initial euphoria about how well these vaccines work," says Jeff Duchin, an infectious disease physician and the public health officer for Seattle & King County. "I think we — in the public health community, in the medical community — facilitated the impression that these vaccines are bulletproof." 

It's hard to keep dialing up and down your risk calculations. So if you'd hoped to avoid getting sick at all, even slightly, it may be time for a "reset," Duchin says. This isn't to be alarmist, but to clear away expectations that COVID is out of your life, and keep up your vigilance about common-sense precautions. 

With more people vaccinated, the total number of breakthrough infections will rise, and that's not unexpected," he says. "I don't think our goal should be to achieve zero risk, because that's unrealistic." 

How high are my chances of getting a breakthrough case these days?

It used to be quite rare, but the rise of delta has changed the odds.


 

Maryland Matters Memo: Vaccines on campus

This article was originally published at https://www.marylandmatters.org on September 10, 2021. Written by Elizabeth Shwe.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

Vaccines on campus

More than 90% of students, faculty and staff at most of Maryland’s colleges have complied with COVID-19 vaccine mandates this fall semester, but the state’s historically black colleges and universities are lagging behind.

The majority of the University of Maryland System’s 12 institutions have vaccination rates of 94% to 98%, Joann Boughman, senior vice chancellor for academic and student affairs for USM, told lawmakers at a briefing on higher education Thursday afternoon.

The University of Maryland College Park has a vaccination compliance rate of 97.7%. By contrast, historically black colleges and universities within the university system — Bowie State University, Coppin State University and University of Maryland Eastern Shore — have vaccination rates between the "very high 60s" and 86%, Boughman said.

“But this isn’t unexpected for us,” Boughman said. “We know there is not only vaccine hesitancy in some of our populations and communities, but real challenges in terms of access for some people over the summer.” The three HBCUs are working hard on promoting vaccination and have on-campus vaccination clinics, she continued.

One lawmaker at Thursday’s hearing took issue with the fact that implementation was left to each campus, even though USM mandated COVID-19 vaccination across all of its institutions for the fall semester.

For instance, students at Bowie State University have until Sept. 30 to get fully vaccinated while Towson University students have to provide proof of their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine by Sept. 10 and University of Maryland College Park’s deadline was Aug. 16.

Read more about the vaccine policies — and concerns from campus workers — at MarylandMatters.org.


 

What we actually know about the vaccines and the delta variant

This article was originally published at https://www.vox.com on August 21, 2021. Written by Dylan Scott.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

The Covid-19 pandemic has changed, and with it, so has the effectiveness of the vaccines.

The bottom line remains the same: The mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna that are most prevalent in the US are still quite effective in preventing any illness from the novel coronavirus, and extremely effective in preventing the kind of severe illness that leads to hospitalization and death. On Wednesday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed those basic facts with its most robust data yet.

But the statistics that were widely publicized when those vaccines were first approved in December — the ones that showed vaccines were 95 percent effective in preventing all illness and 100 percent effective in stopping hospitalization or death — are now thoroughly out of date. The risk that a vaccinated person would experience symptoms if they contract Covid-19 is higher than it was back then, even if it is still significantly lower than if the person were unvaccinated. The now-dominant delta variant is likely to blame.

So exactly how effective are the vaccines against this new, more dangerous iteration of the virus? And how long does immunity provided by the vaccines actually last?


 

Senator, Health Professionals See Vaccine Misinformation as Culprit for Rising COVID Cases

This article was originally published on marylandmatters.org on July 21, 2021. Written by Hannah Gaskill.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

Despite widely available access to the COVID-19 vaccine, cases across the U.S. have begun to see a small spike, leading many officials to blame what they describe as a national vaccine misinformation effort.

“Every day that goes by that some misinformation is allowed to spread — whether it’s intentional lies or just people who haven’t bothered to get the facts — every day that goes on more people die,” U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said at a news conference Wednesday.

According to Van Hollen, 68% of American adults have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, which he called “good news.”

But, he said, vaccine hesitancy still runs rampant across the country, noting that about 90% of people currently hospitalized and “99.5% of those people dying” of COVID-19 are unvaccinated.

He said it’s time to begin calling out disinformation mills, including some of his congressional colleagues.

Van Hollen called this “naming and shaming.”

Andy Slavitt, former administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and senior adviser to the White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator, looked to U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) specifically. Paul came under fire Tuesday for publicly alleging that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci was lying to Congress about funding that the National Institute of Health provided to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for research on coronaviruses.

“It’s a dance, and you’re dancing around this because you’re trying to obscure responsibility for four million people dying around the world from a pandemic,” Paul said.

Fauci countered that the senator did not know what he was talking about, saying reports demonstrated that the viruses used in the experiments were molecularly inconsistent with COVID-19.

“I totally resent the lie that you are propagating, Senator,” Fauci responded. “And you are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individuals — I totally resent that, and if anybody is lying here, senator, it is you.”

Van Hollen came to Fauci’s defense on Twitter Tuesday.

“It’s been absolutely disgraceful to see members of Congress — the House and the Senate — to see right-wing talk show hosts and others attack the credibility of the scientists at a time when it’s [more] important than ever that the American public hear the truth,” Van Hollen said Wednesday afternoon. “And more than shameful, it’s downright dangerous … because we’re continuing to see the spread.”

Slavitt called COVID-19 misinformation a “business.”

“Convincing people not to get vaccinated is a way to either raise money politically or to promote engagement on a website, and this is not what we should expect of each other during a pull together moment,” he said. “If Rand Paul does not want to take a vaccine that’s his right, but his influencing others to not take the vaccine is dangerous and we need to call it out for what it is.”

Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and associate professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering and the Department of Epidemiology at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, said that, since the beginning of the pandemic, she has participated in roundtable discussions to ease vaccine hesitancy, but she hears the same “false beliefs over and over and over again.”

“The statements are so similar when you hear them that you know they have come from the same sources,” Nuzzo said. “And, in fact, we have found that is exactly what’s happening.”

Nuzzo said that it’s a multimillion-dollar industry.

“They are making money but people are dying,” she said.

According to a report released by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, 12 people are behind 65% of anti-vaccine content seen on Twitter and Facebook. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was ranked the second most influential online anti-vaxxer.

A ‘worrisome phase’

According to the World Health Organization, over 4.1 million people have died of COVID-19 globally.

Nuzzo said that the most striking thing about that figure is that most of those deaths have occurred since the vaccine was developed.

“Every human life lost is a complete and utter tragedy,” she said. “To think of the fact that people are still continuing to lose their lives despite having tools on hand to essentially prevent that from happening — it’s just hard to put into words what level of tragedy that is.”

Nuzzo said that it isn’t just the global outlook that’s grim, but that the U.S. is headed into a “worrisome phase” because of a resistance to vaccine rollout.

“​​I am quite worried about what’s happening in part because, although the harms have been far greatest in the states where vaccination uptake is the lowest, we are still seeing pockets in nearly all states where vaccination uptake is not nearly what it should be and, in fact, in some places, are quite low.”

She said that even states with high rates of vaccination have counties resistant to the vaccination effort and that those areas are where surges are being seen.

“We’ve learned a lot about how to treat COVID and how to save people’s lives, but our abilities to be able to do that depends on there being enough resources in the system to be able to provide life-saving care, and when there are surges or patients that are beyond what hospitals can do, then people who otherwise could have been saved, are unfortunately not going to be,” Nuzzo said.

Slavitt clarified that no one is suggesting anyone should be coerced into taking a vaccine against their wishes, but rather that the public should have access to information so they can make informed decisions.

Slavitt also said that it’s time to stop viewing the vaccination effort in a political light.

“This isn’t a litmus test. Whether you choose to get vaccinated — this says nothing about your political beliefs,” he said. “You can believe anything you like and get vaccinated and choose to take care of your family — that’s your right, that’s your opportunity — and if someone tries to tell you or imply to you that you have to follow someone’s political lead because that’s the party you’re in, they’re doing you an incredible disservice.”

hgaskill@marylandmatters.org


 

COVID-19 case count spikes hit almost every state

This article was originally published on thehill.com on July 12, 2021. Written By Justine Coleman.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

Most areas of the country are seeing a new surge in COVID-19 cases as variants of the virus serve as a painful reminder that the pandemic is not over despite eased restrictions.

Forty-one states and the District of Columbia have documented an increase in average daily cases over the past two weeks. But nine in particular, including seven in the South, have seen cases at least double in that time period, according to data from The New York Times.

In Los Angeles County, officials recorded more than 1,000 new cases for three consecutive days this week for the first time since March. Arkansas also reported more than 1,000 new cases for a third straight day Friday.

 
210714091449-new-covid-main-graphic-0714-exlarge-169.jpg
covid-testing-rising-cases-promo-1595445188429-mobileMasterAt3x-v3.png

 

The 3 Simple Rules That Underscore the Danger of Delta

This article was originally published in The Atlantic Magazine on July 1, 2021. Written by Ed Yong.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

Fifteen months after the novel coronavirus shut down much of the world, the pandemic is still raging. Few experts guessed that by this point, the world would have not one vaccine but many, with 3 billion doses already delivered. At the same time, the coronavirus has evolved into super-transmissible variants that spread more easily. The clash between these variables will define the coming months and seasons. Here, then, are three simple principles to understand how they interact. Each has caveats and nuances, but together, they can serve as a guide to our near-term future.

Vaccines are still beating the variants, but the unvaccinated world is being pummeled.

1. The vaccines are still beating the variants.

The vaccines have always had to contend with variants: The Alpha variant (also known as B.1.1.7) was already spreading around the world when the first COVID-19 vaccination campaigns began. And in real-world tests, they have consistently lived up to their extraordinary promise. The vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna reduce the risk of symptomatic infections by more than 90 percent, as does the still-unauthorized one from Novavax. Better still, the available vaccines slash the odds that infected people will spread the virus onward by at least half and likely more. In the rare cases that the virus breaks through, infections are generally milder, shorter, and lower in viral load. As of June 21, the CDC reported just 3,907 hospitalizations among fully vaccinated people and just 750 deaths.

Could the Delta variant (also known as B.1.617.2) change that picture? Data from the U.K. suggest that it is 35 to 60 percent better at spreading than Alpha, which was already 43 to 90 percent more transmissible than the original virus. (It may also be deadlier, but that’s still unclear.) It now causes 26 percent of new infections in the U.S. and will soon cause most of them.

But even against Delta, full vaccination—with a heavy emphasis on full—is effective.  Two doses of Pfizer’s vaccine are still 88 percent effective at preventing symptomatic Delta infections, according to a U.K. study, and 96 percent effective at preventing hospitalization. (A single dose, however, is only 33 percent effective at stopping symptomatic infection.) Israel, a highly vaccinated country, is experiencing a small Delta surge, but so far, none of the new cases has been severe. And while about 30 percent of those new cases have been in fully vaccinated people, this statistic reflects, in part, the country’s success at vaccination. Because Israel has fully vaccinated about 85 percent of adults, you would expect many new infections to occur in that very large group. “It does seem like the vaccines are holding their own against the variants,” Emma Hodcroft, an epidemiologist at the University of Bern, told me. “That’s something we can take some comfort from.”

But the coronavirus can cause serious problems without triggering severe infections. Because people can develop long COVID without ending up in the hospital, could Delta still cause long-term symptoms even if vaccines blunt its sting? The anecdotal reports of long-haulers whose symptoms abated after vaccination might suggest otherwise, but “we don’t know enough to say,” Bill Hanage, an epidemiologist at Harvard, told me.

Another crucial question that “we really need to understand is the nature of transmission from breakthrough cases,” Hanage said. Worryingly, a recent study documented several cases during India’s spring surge in which health-care workers who were fully vaccinated with AstraZeneca’s vaccine were infected by Delta and passed it on.

If other vaccines have similar vulnerabilities, vaccinated people might have to keep wearing masks indoors to avoid slingshotting the virus into unvaccinated communities, especially during periods of high community transmission. “That is unfortunately the direction this is headed,” says Ravindra Gupta, a clinical microbiologist at the University of Cambridge, who led the study. Israel has reimposed a mask mandate, while Los Angeles County and the World Health Organization have advised that vaccinated people should wear masks indoors. And such measures make sense because ...

2. The variants are pummeling unvaccinated people.

Vaccinated people are safer than ever despite the variants. But unvaccinated people are in more danger than ever because of the variants. Even though they’ll gain some protection from the immunity of others, they also tend to cluster socially and geographically, seeding outbreaks even within highly vaccinated communities.

The U.K., where half the population is fully vaccinated, “can be a cautionary tale,” Hanage told me. Since Delta’s ascendancy, the country’s cases have increased sixfold. Long-COVID cases will likely follow. Hospitalizations have almost doubled. That’s not a sign that the vaccines are failing. It is a sign that even highly vaccinated countries host plenty of vulnerable people.

Delta’s presence doesn’t mean that unvaccinated people are doomed. When Alpha came to dominate continental Europe, many countries decided not to loosen their restrictions, and the variant didn’t trigger a huge jump in cases. “We do have agency,” Hodcroft said. “The variants make our lives harder, but they don’t dictate everything.”

In the U.S., most states have already fully reopened. Delta is spreading more quickly in counties with lower vaccination rates, whose immunological vulnerability reflects social vulnerability. Black and Hispanic Americans are among the most likely groups to die of COVID-19 but the least likely to be vaccinated. Immunocompromised people may not benefit from the shots. Children under 12 are still ineligible. And unlike in many other wealthy countries, the pace of vaccinations in America is stalling because of lack of access, uncertainty, and distrust. To date, 15 states, most of which are in the South, have yet to fully vaccinate half their adults. “Watch the South in the summer,” Hanage said. “That’ll give us a flavor of what we’re likely to see in the fall and winter.”

Globally, vaccine inequities are even starker. Of the 3 billion vaccine doses administered worldwide, about 70 percent have gone to just six countries; Delta has already been detected in at least 85. While America worries about the fate of states where around 40 percent of people are fully vaccinated, barely 10 percent of the world’s population has achieved that status, including just 1 percent of Africa’s. The coronavirus is now tearing through southern Africa, South America, and Central and Southeast Asia. The year is only half over, but more people have already been infected and killed by the coronavirus in 2021 than in 2020. And new variants are still emerging. Lambda, the latest to be recognized by the WHO, is dominant in Peru and spreading rapidly in South America.

Many nations that excelled at protecting their citizens are now facing a triple threat: They controlled COVID-19 so well that they have little natural immunity; they don’t have access to vaccines; and they’re besieged by Delta. At the start of this year, Vietnam had recorded just 1,500 COVID-19 cases—fewer than many individual American prisons. But it is now facing a huge Delta-induced surge when just 0.19 percent of its people have been fully vaccinated. If even Vietnam, which so steadfastly held the line against COVID-19, is now buckling under the weight of Delta, “it’s a sign that the world may not have that much time,” Dylan Morris, an evolutionary biologist at UCLA, told me.

With Delta and other variants spreading so quickly, “my great fear is that in not very long, everyone globally will either have been vaccinated or infected,” Morris said. He didn’t want to pinpoint a time frame, but “I don’t want to bet that we have more than a year,” he said. And richer nations would be wrong to think that the variants will spare them, because ...

3. The longer Principle No. 2 continues, the less likely No. 1 will hold.

Whenever a virus infects a new host, it makes copies of itself, with small genetic differences—mutations—that distinguish the new viruses from their parents. As an epidemic widens, so does the range of mutations, and viruses that carry advantageous ones that allow them to, for example, spread more easily or slip past the immune system to outcompete their standard predecessors. That’s how we got super-transmissible variants like Alpha and Delta. And it’s how we might eventually face variants that can truly infect even vaccinated people.

None of the scientists I talked with knows when that might occur, but they agree that the odds shorten as the pandemic lengthens. “We have to assume that’s going to happen,” Gupta told me. “The more infections are permitted, the more probable immune escape becomes.”

If that does happen, when would we know? This is the first pandemic in history in which scientists are sequencing the genes of a new virus, and tracking its evolution, in real time—that’s why we know about the variants at all. Genomic surveillance can tell which mutations are rising to the fore, and lab experiments can show how these mutations change the virus—that’s how we know which variants are concerning. But even with such work “happening at incredible speed,” Hodcroft told me, “we can’t test every variant that we see.”

Many countries lack sequencing facilities, and those that have them can be easily swamped. “Again and again, we have seen variants pop up in places that are under extraordinary strain because those variants are causing large surges,” Hanage said. Delta ripped its way through India, “but we only understood it when it started causing infections in the U.K.—a country that had plenty of scientists with sequencers and less to do.” So the first sign of a vaccine-beating variant will likely be an uptick in disease. “If vaccinated folks start getting sick and enter hospitals with symptoms, we’ll have a pretty good picture of what’s going on,” Maia Majumder, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School and Boston Children's Hospital, told me.

We’re unlikely to be as vulnerable as we were at the beginning of the pandemic. The vaccines induce a variety of protective antibodies and immune cells, so it’s hard for a variant virus to evade them all. These defenses also vary from person to person, so even if a virus eludes one person’s set, it might be stymied when it jumps into a new host. “I don’t think there’ll suddenly be a variant that pops up and evades everything, and suddenly our vaccines are useless,” Gupta told me. “It’ll be incremental: With every stepwise change in the virus, a chunk of protection is lost in individuals. And people on the edges—the vulnerable who haven’t mounted a full response—will end up bearing the cost.”

If that happens, vaccinated people might need booster shots. Those should be possible: The mRNA vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer should be especially easy to revise against changing viruses. But “if we need boosters, I worry that countries that are able to produce vaccines will do so for their own populations, and the division around the world will become even greater,” Maria van Kerkhove, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at the WHO, told me.

The discussion about vaccine-beating variants echoes the early debates about whether SARS-CoV-2 would go pandemic. “We don’t think too well as a society about low-probability events that have far-reaching consequences,” Majumder told me. “We need to prepare for a future where we are doing vaccine rollout again, and we need to figure out how to do that better.” In the meantime, even highly vaccinated nations should continue investing in other measures that can control COVID-19 but have been inadequately used—improved ventilation, widespread rapid tests, smarter contact tracing, better masks, places in which sick people can isolate, and policies like paid sick leave. Such measures will also reduce the spread of the virus among unvaccinated communities, creating fewer opportunities for an immune-escape variant to arise. “I find myself the broken record who always emphasizes all the other tools we have,” van Kerkhove said. “It’s not vaccines only. We’re not using what we have at hand.”

The WHO’s decision to name variants after the Greek alphabet means that at some point, we’ll probably be dealing with an Omega variant. Our decisions now will determine whether that sinister name is accompanied by equally sinister properties, or whether Omega will be just an unremarkable scene during the pandemic’s closing act.


Mayor Scott, Health Commissioner Announce New Collaboration

RELEASE: Mayor Scott, Health Commissioner Announce New Collaboration with Local Healthcare Partners to Provide Mobile Vaccination Clinics in Baltimore City


Mobile Clinics Targeted to Support Older Adults in Baltimore

BALTIMORE, MD (Monday, February 8, 2021) — Today, Mayor Brandon M. Scott and Health Commissioner Dr. Letitia Dzirasa joined partners from MedStar Health, Lifebridge Health, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and the Johns Hopkins School of Nursing to announce a mobile vaccination and outreach strategy targeting older adults in Baltimore City. This new strategy will feature mobile response teams that will go directly to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes around Baltimore to provide vaccinations to older adults in eligible Priority Groups, for whom transportation or mobility issues may make a centralized mass vaccination location difficult to reach.

This new mobile outreach strategy follows the Maryland Department of Health’s guidance to prioritize senior buildings with the highest density of older residents age 65 and above. The prioritization criteria also includes going where there are recent COVID-19 outbreaks and to neighborhoods with low vaccination rates. 

“It is critical that equity and our most vulnerable populations, like older adults, remain at the forefront of our vaccination strategy in Baltimore City,” said Mayor Brandon M. Scott. “This includes taking special care to ensure that older adults in our Black and Brown communities who are more susceptible to the virus and less likely to have access to internet and transportation can be vaccinated. I am extremely grateful to our partners at MedStar Health, Lifebridge Health, and Johns Hopkins for taking these extra steps to ensure a more equitable distribution of the vaccine in Baltimore.”

Mobile response teams will be deployed to congregate settings where individuals at high risk for COVID-19 live, such as senior housing, assisted living facilities, and nursing homes, as well as homeless shelters and group homes for individuals with disabilities. 

To ensure residents are aware of the vaccination clinics and to have the opportunity to engage with Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) staff and ask questions, Community Health Workers will visit the mobile vaccination sites beforehand to conduct outreach and help residents register for appointments up to one week in advance. 

“Community Health Workers are trusted members of the community and have already established relationships with the coordinators of many of the housing sites we’ll be visiting,” said Baltimore City Health Commissioner Dr. Letitia Dzirasa. “This model of vaccine outreach, combining proactive education, pre-registration, and bringing vaccinations directly to the community, exemplifies the Health Department’s commitment to addressing vaccine hesitancy and reducing barriers to vaccine access.”

A scheduling form will be sent to independent living facilities to gauge interest in mobile clinics slated for the next two months. Scheduling will be confirmed weekly based on vaccine supply. In the coming weeks, BCHD will deploy a public dashboard highlighting mobile clinics around Baltimore.

The first mobile clinic took place on January 29 at Cherry Hill Senior Homes. BCHD and partners are working to rapidly scale up mobile efforts, with a goal of deploying up to 20 mobile teams at a time by mid summer.

“We’re honored and pleased to be assisting Baltimore City and its health department, along with other healthcare partners by providing comprehensive vaccination teams to support the city’s most vulnerable populations including our senior residents,” said Katie O’Conor, M.D., Operations Chief and Co-Chair of Vaccine Equity for the Unified Command at Johns Hopkins Medicine.

“We are grateful for the opportunity to support our Baltimore City Health Department partners to equitably distribute their vaccine supply,” Dr. Michelle Patch, PhD, MSN, APRN, RN, Assistant Professor and Director, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Vaccine Volunteers Programs said. “We are committed to the health of our community and stand ready to respond to the areas of priority they identify.”

“At LifeBridge Health, our purpose statement is ‘Caring for Our Communities Together,’ and we are proud to join with the City of Baltimore and our fellow health partners in this initiative to bring COVID-19 vaccines into our communities. We are excited to be launching our new ‘Care Happens Here’ mobile units at this same time, as these new mobile resources allow us to bring more of our healthcare services, including vaccinations, directly to the residents we serve,” said Rebecca Altman, LifeBridge Health Vice President and Chief Integration Officer.

“We are proud to partner with the Baltimore City Health Department to ensure that our pandemic response meets people exactly where they are,” said Ryan Moran, Director of Community Health for MedStar Health. “We believe equity must be central to our response designed to remove barriers that stand in the way of people receiving the vaccine. Through this partnership, MedStar Health has activated an outreach strategy to reach our most at-risk, vulnerable older adults in Baltimore City. Taking our mobile center and clinical teams into the community is critical to the success of the effort.”

Mobile teams are bringing vaccination clinics to vulnerable individuals who qualify for and want a COVID-19 vaccine and have difficulty accessing them due to transportation issues or lack of internet access. The Federal Pharmacy Partnership has been vaccinating residents of long-term care facilities and assisted living facilities, but this initiative will provide direct outreach to those facilities to ensure that they are covered.


How Truth Decay Is Fueling Vaccine Hesitancy

How Truth Decay Is Fueling Vaccine Hesitancy

This article was originally published on rand.org on May 14, 2021.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

More than 150 million Americans—over half of U.S. adults—have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. But many people are hesitant to get the shot. A recent poll found that more than a quarter of Americans will not try to get vaccinated.

Why are so many people opting out? The reasons vary. Even though the available COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective, some people doubt that getting the shot will better protect them from the virus. Others are concerned about side effects. And some simply don't trust the public health and government officials who are urging them to get the vaccine. In fact, one RAND study showed that public trust in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declined 10 percent from May to October 2020, a critical stretch of the pandemic.


 

Why you should stop obsessing about coronavirus news, and how to do it

This article was originally printed in Los Angeles Times, March 11, 2020.


 
Quotation-Marks-1-modified.png
 

It’s 1 in the morning and you can’t stop reading about the coronavirus.

Maybe you want to know if you should cancel your trip to Hawaii over spring break or whether your kid’s school will be closed, or how many people are likely to die.

You look for answers on websites you trust, along with some you’re not so sure about. And when you can’t find conclusive information, you keep searching, clicking and reading.

If you have descended into a coronavirus rabbit hole, you are not alone.


It’s only natural to feel anxious about the evolving coronavirus situation. It is a novel threat that has caused more than 4,200 deaths worldwide.

But experts say there is something else that is adding to our collective anxiety around the potential pandemic: fear of the unknown.

“Our brains are wired to pay additional attention to uncertainty,” said David Rock, co-founder of the NeuroLeadership Institute and author of “Your Brain at Work.” “It is something we all have an issue with, although it affects some people more than others.”

And when it comes to coronavirus, there is a lot of uncertainty.

Researchers are still learning how the virus spreads, its fatality rate and how best to treat it. At the same time, information about new cases and deaths come in on a daily, if not hourly, basis.


Things are changing so quickly that it can be hard to know how best to respond to keep yourself and others safe.

And for some, the advice coming from public health organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — to wash your hands, cover your cough and stay home if you’re sick — may not feel sufficient in the face of what they perceive to be an overwhelming threat.

“That information is not very satisfying to people,” said Paul Slovic, a psychologist at the University of Oregon who studies risk perception. “People want a pill, they want a vaccine, they want to feel a sense of control.”

Rock said that in the face of an ambiguous situation — may be fine, maybe bad — our brains automatically bet on it being very bad, just in case.

“It’s an insurance policy,” he said. “If you think you hear a bear in the woods, it’s better to be safe and start running than wait until you see one running at you.”

One way people try to exert control during times of uncertainty is to increase their media consumption, said Roxane Cohen Silver, a professor of psychological science and public health at UC Irvine.

“When there is a lot of ambiguity and a lot of uncertainty, people are drawn to the media,” she said. “It’s a cycle that is very hard to break out of.”


Looking to the media in a time of public crisis can be useful. Trusted sources can help you make informed decisions to protect your health. They can also counteract harmful rumors and alleviate distress by providing accurate information that puts the threat in context, Silver said. (For example, it’s helpful to be reminded that about 80% of those infected with the new coronavirus have symptoms that are mild at worst.)

However, Silver’s research over the last two decades has also shown that in times of collective trauma like natural disasters and mass shootings, the nonstop media cycle can also cause people to overestimate the severity of the threat to their own community — and that leads to psychological and even physical distress.

In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Silver and her collaborators found that increased television exposure to the horrific events was associated with post-traumatic stress and cardiovascular problems three years later.

“These were people who only learned about the attacks on television, and who were really stressed about it,” she said. “You didn’t have to know someone who died that day, or know someone who was there to be impacted.”

In another study, the same team found that after the Boston Marathon bombings in 2013, people who reported the highest media exposure also reported higher levels of acute stress than those who were actually there.

“The media is a double-edged sword,” she said. “It is the mechanism by which we get important, validated information. But at the same time, we need to protect ourselves from the onslaught of the 24/7 news cycle.”

So, what’s a healthy dose of media that will keep you informed without needlessly stressing you out?

Baruch Fischhoff, a psychologist and decision scientist at Carnegie Mellon University, recommends choosing three print media sources and one local public health agency to follow. Then check in on their coronavirus coverage once a day.

“Remember that the expertise of TV and radio is to keep you listening and to engage you,” he said.


Rock’s advice is to limit your coronavirus media consumption to 10 minutes a day, not 10 minutes an hour.

“The more we can feel like we are in control, the calmer we’ll be,” he said. “And one thing you can control is your media intake.”

Silver said she reminds her own friends and family to stay informed but to avoid repetitive stories with little or no new information, because they can amplify one’s sense of stress and doom.

“Things are very different this week than they were last week, and we don’t really know where things will be next week,” she said. “It is challenging and stressful to cope with all this uncertainty, but overexposure to media is not likely to help.”